We’re all fascinated by child prodigies. Mozart, Bobby Fischer, Freddy Adu, Traci Lords – all youngsters who fascinated the population because of their professional prowess at such a young age.
Marla Olmstead was no different. She started painting abstract art before she could even piss on a toilet, selling her first pieces by the age of 2. By the time she was four, her elaborate paintings were fetching as much as $15,000 each, she was exhibiting in New York and Los Angeles and was a media star.
And as quickly as she burst onto the scene, her fame and fortune vanished. 60 Minutes, with her parents cooperation, placed a hidden camera in the house to capture her painting her next masterpiece. Only problem was, it turned out not to be a masterpiece. And according to a child psychologist, her painting technique was no different than any other 4 year-old, except for one thing: her father coached her on how to paint.
My Kid Could Paint That follows the Olmsteads, first through the giddy high that came with national stardom, and subsequently through the anguish that followed the 60 Minutes expose.
As the hate mail flows in following the 60 Minutes piece, we watch Marla’s parents try to keep their cash cow alive. Like corporate PR geniuses, they videotape Marla’s next painting, which they and the gallery owner responsible for selling the painting, hail as a work of a genius. But the documentary’s director, whom the Olmstead’s now see as their best chance at reversing the backlash that followed the questioning 60 Minutes piece, as well as the couple that ultimately buys the painting, have their doubts.
What at first appears to be a movie about a child genius instead turns into a documentary about art, media, parenthood and ultimately the bias inherent to any form of art. It asks more questions than it answers, leaving the audience to decide on the ultimate truth: Was Marla’s father responsible for putting the finishing touches on her paintings?
Much like Marla’s paintings, the movie is multifaceted, painting a broad, moving story. From Marla’s mother, to her father, to the gallery owner – a photo-realistic painter whose paintings can take up to a year of painstaking work to finish – everyone plays a vital role in what is ultimately an impressive, intelligent, thought-provoking movie that doesn’t definitively answer its own questions. Instead, mirroring Marla’s handiwork, the ultimate truth is in the eye of the beholder.
Verdict: 89 out of 100.

(1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
(2 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)